Decision in process after with editor springer reddit. Days from acceptance to .
Decision in process after with editor springer reddit This can be several rounds of reading by different people, but eventually a decision is reached (either at the weekly editorial meeting or by a specialist associate editor, depending on journal) about whether to send the paper out for review. For 1 month, the status was "awaiting admin processing. On Dec. The discussions in this reddit should be of an academic nature, and should avoid "pop psychology. If they aren’t prepared to reply sensibly, then probably pull it anyway, and tell others about your experience so your colleagues don’t waste time with the journal in question. The editor asked us to resubmit the manuscript. If it gets rejected, you will get comments on why it was rejected and must change your paper accordingly. I know the person from Fed Reserve who was reaponsible. This means that the editor is seriously thinking about it. Now imagine that the professor is also an editor who has to do extra work on top of everything else. Ethical issues Speed, usage, and impact make-up the suite of Springer journal metrics. My research group submitted an article to scientific reports about 2 months ago. Note: In some journals: the reviewer's assigned status is I submitted a manuscript in a journal (Springer) and after 3 days the status of my MS changed to "With the Editor" followed by "Decision in Process" after 5 days. It did not go for peer review. Usually the decision letter came quickly - in 3 days. So, I shortened the title that does not change the intention of the paper. Actually I am not referring to the peer review process, it usually takes time, in fact, some editors after receiving the "Dear Editor, Thanks so much for this offer. Source: I’m an associate editor at an elsevier journal and have handled hundreds of papers I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. An editor who is invited may decline in some cases. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned At least it is good to pass initial screening stage and reach at selecton of reviewers. So, a change to Decision in Process after the peer review means the Associate/Managing Editor (AE/ME) has looked at the reviewers’ comments, made their decision on the paper based on those comments, and has now Coming to your query, Decision in Process typically means that the associate editor (AE) has gone through the peer review comments, arrived at a decision on the manuscript based on the comments, and then conveyed I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. If they accept, it will go out for review. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). As soon as an editor begins work on your paper, he/she will inform you that the decision is in process. Information which will help the Editor verify the identity and expertise of the reviewer will be required. It is possible that this journal sends out invitations to the editor as soon as a manuscript is submitted, and an admin person conducts the manuscript screening while waiting for the editor to accept the invitation. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. An appeal letter includes some critical components to have an impact on the editor’s final decision Assess what exactly has happened (fact finding) and be transparent and final about decisions; In case of potential media attention (e. process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. " I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal a few months ago. 2021. 4. After completion of peer review, the associate editor usually sends his recommendation to the editor-in-chief of a journal. 1 Conversations End with Toxicity in Different Categories of Tree. I have submitted my research article to Environment, Development and Sustainability (Springer) 3 weeks ago. 123). If the Editor-in-Chief decides the paper is within the Journal's remit, the This implies a stretch between the desk decision and the next one about which you would be notified. I sent a manuscript to a high reputation Elsevier journal. Later, "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. It's been 3 weeks and the status is still at decision pending. The process then starts all over again (editor reviews the reply, sends it out, referees react and so on). Does anyone have any idea Once the AE has completed their review, they will make their decision on the manuscript and communicate it to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), changing the status to Decision in Process/Progress. Both decision in process and decision in progress mean that the associate editor has submitted your paper to the senior editor. I just had a paper transferred after a desk reject to a sister journal. the editor gives it to reviewer #1, reviewer #1 gives it back to editor, editor gives it to reviewer #2, and so on). the review process with this journal has formally ended. If you have a specific hard deadline by which you will need a decision, please let me know. Elsevier and Springer both usually take 6 weeks. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. The status said "reviews completed" (2 reviewers sent their reports). Cool, no problem, people are busy. It very much eases the publishing process if the authors adopt a constructive approach, both in their responses to reviewers and in the cover letter to the editor. Editors rely upon the reviewers to get outside expert perspectives about the relevance and quality of the paper, especially if it is A direct change to Decision Under Process (sometimes, also called Decision in Process) after With Editor means that the editor has had a look at the paper and arrived at a decision on the paper, which is to not send it for peer review. The lack of notice from Reddit, exorbitant pricing and terrible official apps are The status changed to 'Under review' for around 2. Certainly, you will get something important to improve the quality of your paper. Would welcome any and all stories of what your dog was like during those first few years to help me re-evaluate my decision if needed. e. Analysis of literature shows that Reddit gained popularity in fields such as sociology, psychology, medicine, linguistics, and even fun fact: when qoukkas feel threatened, they throw their young at the predator to distract it and escape. I have the same issues with Springer right now. Health research news usually diffuses from research Reddit. Most recent answer. Why is As a general rule, Springer is not very quick. While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. A ‘Decision in Process’ soon after submission typically indicates that the In the context of the journal review process, the status "Decision Rescinded" typically indicates that a previous decision made on a manuscript has been reversed or withdrawn by the editor or journal. I submitted a manuscript to a journal on September. FWIW, I’ve not seen reject and resubmits converted to publications on any articles that I’ve reviewed where the editor has given authors that decision. After the 1st round of review one of the reviewers rejected the manuscript and subsequently the paper was rejected by the editor. The review time was around 40-45 days, so we expected that after the review was over, we'd get a decision within 2-3 days. Let us now outline the related state of the art, and start from the role of Reddit as the source of data. I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a The "decision in process" is the editor choosing if the next step is acceptance, revision, or rejection. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that In this paper, we use a dataset collected from Reddit, containing posts from different sub-Reddits, to extract and interpret meaningful insights using natural language processing techniques followed by supervised machine learning algorithms to build a predictive model to analyze different states of mental health. The gold open access route should have no bearing on how long the review process takes. For example, although we try to limit the review period as much as possible we are highly de 46 Springer Nature Associate Editor interview questions and 41 interview reviews. "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. 8. What could be the scenario? If we have some more revision to do means the editor could've sent us the update to incorporate reviewer comments rite? The process includes the steps : editor , reviewer , and final decision . Edit: you will only receive an email when the editor makes a decision based on the reviews and will communicate the final result. The main status says under review. Open access simply means that the article is freely available to everyone if its accepted and published. My understanding is that the editor has made The editor has received the reviews and s/he is in the process of judging them (sometimes maybe s/he will decide on a new review, but not likely) and communicating the decision to you. I submitted a manuscript to the journal then the status changed to With Editor After a certain period it was changed to the decision in the process. Days from submission to first decision. The advantage is the editor believes they can publish your paper. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and The peer review really depend on which journal do it. More than that you may email him Reddit. Publishing is free to the scientist and the journal get their money from subscription fee from library and people that want to stay up to date with the latest development in a field (University, R&D division, other researcher, etc). raids, deportations, etc. The number of days from submission of a manuscript to first decision. If you Even within Springer publications, the process flow may vary slightly depending on the journal. After that we sent a rebuttal letter to editor. In that case, what it means is that if you don't get a decision in a week (7 days) you will likely need to wait a while for that first decision other than desk reject. Or check it out in the app stores Get rid of the idea that a paper deserves a certain journal and just keep the process moving forward by submitting elsewhere. And it seems to be one of the last steps of the process. If required, the editor may consult the After second revision (minor), I felt that the title was too long. Then, two weeks later it switched back to "passed technical checks, now I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. The editor appeared to fast-track the paper, formatting should be a minor task, and they worked diligently to find reviewers, proof, and publish. This means that so far, your paper was going through a review process. My manuscript status shows "With Editor" after initial submission. Cite This happened to me with one ElsevIer Journal, while I received only To update you, two reviews have been returned. I believe you will get an email 24-48h later saying it is or isn’t out for review. It is not possible to put a definitive timescale on when an article will be published as there are many aspects in the process which are unpredictable. My MS apparently My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. ' Is 8 days a long time to I have been out of academia for a few years now so I don't really know about recent developments. The article went to chief editor on March 25. After 18 days the status changed to "Decision in Process". I expect that very soon you will receive the answer. Revise and resubmit mean that the editor sees clear solutions and ways to address the problems brought up by the reviewers. The predictive tools developed under eRisk’s shared tasks could be potentially useful in different areas, particularly those related to health and safety. Editorial assessment 2. The most probable outcome is that the paper is rejected, in which case you move down the ladder and submit the manuscript to a different, most likely less prestigious journal. Till date it says "decision in process". g. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor decides on a course of action and provides feedback to the I eventually contacted the editor and received the accept decision not long after, but yeah, it can take a long time unfortunately. The first peer review process was completed after one month and a major revision was the decision. The peer reviewers will provide an assessment of your manuscript, but ultimately the decision to accept or reject your manuscript for publication is made, not by the peer reviewers, but by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal [1, 5, 18,19,20]. I haven't The editor sent me the comments of this reviewer with a decision of "Acceptable after major revision and re-evaluation". When sending an email by using the reply-email, these emails get to the editorial office who then is supposed to forward it to the handling editor (sometimes even going first over the editor-in-chief). My manuscript prospectus is being reviewed by other presses at the moment and so will need some time to finalize my decision. 2. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor follows guidelines published by the Committee on Publication Ethics. Sometimes this can take few weeks for various personal reasons (for example heavy work load on the editor). Springer Nature has a huge portfolio of journals, so I’m not going to dispute that the name can be misleading to a lay audience, but beyond that, is the content really that bad? I’ve read and used plenty of useful stuff that was published in SR, and it doesn’t seem to deserve all the hate it gets (based on my experience anyway). We will endeavour to get a decision to you as soon as we can and assure you we are keeping our eye on the progress of your manuscript. 3 weeks and it is over two weeks now. When the ultimate decision of whether to accept a paper depended on a second layer of input from peer review, these weaker papers were subjected to a second filter. Inaccuracy has been a common problem in news coverage of scientific research [1, 2]. In these communities, learners connect with others using ‘knowledge that is collaboratively constructed through their dialogues and social interactions’ (De Laat 2006, p. Authors should not recommend recent collaborators or colleagues who work in the same institution as themselves. [57] Although each journal provides a description of submission statuses on their site, these statuses are not always easy to decipher. In some cases, the AE may again send the manuscript for peer review. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance that it can still undergo the peer review process? The turnaround time (TAT) for this journal is 2. Background: I worked for 6 months as a research assistant on a project headed by my former PhD supervisor a few years ago. Now, after that reviewer completed the review, that status changed immediatly to "Review Completed" and then to "Decision in Process". Also known as: with editors (APS), editor assigned (Editorial Manager, AIP), AE assignment (IEEE), assigned to the editor (NPG) Typical duration: A few workdays to several weeks. Internet technologies have broadened learning opportunities among their users by giving rise to the emergence of networked learning communities. Maybe because "Decision in progess" is described on Elsevier's support website as: "The final Handling Editor in a journal with split decision and author notification tasks has submitted a decision but the Administrative Editor has not yet notified the author". true Perfectly reasonable at this poor to seek clarification of where the paper is in the review process, and how much longer it will take. If a journal offers both (open access & traditional 'closed' options) then they'll go through the same editorial and review process. The time it takes to fully review a paper ranges depending on the journal but typically the process takes several months. Reply reply the largest community on reddit discussing education and student life in Hello! My coauthor and I submitted a paper to one of Springer's journals at the end of August. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. The status have been "With editor" since a month. After this, it went to "Under Review" in a decent time frame and was there for about 4-5 weeks. The manuscript had the With Editor status for about 4 months. I find it strange that reviewers have already been selected and that reviews have already Here’s how decision-making works: on submission, the editorial team read your paper. S. " I checked the status recently and it has changed to "awaiting final decision. However, there surely is a trend towards open access: eLife is a project founded by Randy Schekman (Nobel laureate) and the Max Planck Society (elite research association) so at least the top of the cream is moving in an open-access direction. Then make your decision. Again, I made the required edits in order to make After about 1 year, it has been still stocked in the stage of "decision in process". As an editor I always try to establish a good relation with all the researchers / authors who wish to publish their work. I recently received two very positive reviews requiring minor edits in the IEEE Access journal. Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. For the first Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now journal. Worrying will change nothing. My paper is now decision in process for over two weeksa after second revision ( 2 reviewers accept, 1 reviewer major revision). The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I had 'decision in process' for 2. This seems like a long time to wait for the editorial decision. In this step, the editor carefully evaluates all If rejected after review you should get detailed comments. Final decision can be : rejection, acceptance with revision ( minor changes, or major changes) or acceptance without revision. At the first submission, the status has been updated at each step (ex. Does this Decision in process: When the Associate editor enters his recommendation (which then is sent to the author by the editor-in-chief). This decision could either be an acceptance, rejection, or request for revisions. @Ijaz Durrani and @Jorge P. Good luck! Related reading: After three rounds of review and revision, why is the status "with editor" again? Sixteen former guests of The Jerry Springer Show, who were interviewed on various U. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Reddit. The timeline went from Editor invited (is editor a subject or a direct object?) on September 2 to reviews received (not reviewers received) on September 12 (see pic here). If the decision is not to send the manuscript for review, the Editor-in-Chief contacts the author with the decision. Easy process for everyone. This journal only has one editor (with a grad student working as a managing editor). 6 months several years ago in Econ Letters. The editor has probably sent it to an expert in the field to get a feel on its impact/significance (not review). Stage 4: Decision. In addition, the academic editor initially assigned to it was also changed. It roughly took around 19 days in total for this whole process. Even if the decision in process status takes a couple of weeks more, you have nothing to worry about. My manuscript went from "With the Editor" to "Decision in Process" after I submitted it to a journal, which had a median decision time of 10 days. In this case, the initial "With Editor" status probably appeared when the Editor-in-chief or Editorial Assistants had a look at the manuscript to check if the basic journal requirements were in place and assign the manuscript id. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor may ask the publisher via their in-house contact for advice on difficult or complicated cases. For this, while submitting the cover letter (to the With some journals, editors are invited and not assigned. On the other hand, if the status changes to “Decision in process,” it implies that the Editor is making the decision on your paper. It took five days for getting the "Editor assigned" status after my submission and still Overall, it has two different stages of editorial procedures: the initial process stage and the review process stage. They are currently deciding whether your manuscript is fit for If after multiple rounds of reading you still feel that editor response is unreasonable, make sure to carefully acknowledge and agree with all reasonable concerns listed and only then tell why they are easy to address. I'd wait a bit longer before contacting the editor though - I felt more comfortable doing that because the editor had already expressed support for the paper. 12 votes, 49 comments. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Thank you for the information Profs. We didn't receive the comments yet. The submission status has not changed since the last 3 weeks. There is two main system for peer review. I'm definitely interested. Editors are often busy. Most likely the reviewers offered a decision and the editor is preparing a decision based on their comments. The distribution is neither uniform nor normal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned On average, according to data provided in Springer Journal Finder, on average, it would take 85 days for the first decision in Water Resources Management and 62 days for the first decision in the So the thing is, I have been looking quite often on the Elsevier tracking system and it seems that many reviewers were invited (2+), after 2 months and only 1 accepted to review. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Free interview details posted anonymously by Springer Nature interview candidates. Now, again it Was the status updated when you received the decision letter the previous time? Did it become "Decision Reverted" immediately after you submitted the revised manuscript or after a few days? Since this status is rather unusual, I think you should email the editor/journal office asking what it means and by when you can receive a decision. The study’s findings reveal that toxic conversations in online communities tend to diminish over time due to their inherently toxic nature. Yes, they were the ones deciding which papers were sent for peer review all along, but now weak/poorly conducted papers can now be “published” in eLife based on a single editor’s decision. Again, I made the required edits in order to make Summary of Decision in Process. In the former stage, when a manuscript is submitted and come into the editorial system—the Springer calls it the ‘Editorial Manager’—the editor-in-chief is to check the similarity score and other related matters—a sort of checking point for possible academic If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to Once an editor is identified, the status changes to ‘decision in process’. I submitted a manuscript in a journal (Springer) and after 3 days the status of my MS changed to "With the Editor" followed by "Decision in Process" after 5 days. Don't go for accepting, instead of that by considering their suggestions just re format the manuscript, add few papers from the particular I have been editor and guest editor of many scientific journals. I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. At the core of our research are networked Hi, it is better to submit to one Journal and patiently wait for the editor's response. 1 Reddit as a Data Source. Reddit posts have been selected, since they are a popular in scientific research [2, 3, 7]. Then your status would shift to None of these things are reliable indicators of what the decision will be. Your submission is now with the Associate Editor for recommendation, and will then go to the Senior Associate Editor and EiC for further recommendation and decision. Then the status date updated, but the status remained “editor assigned”. Not really. , does receiving the editor's decision letter take time or is it a fast process? Any similar experiences here? Thanks in advance. Now, again it eRisk is a CLEF lab whose main goal is to explore issues of evaluation methodology, performance metrics and other challenges related to building testbeds for early risk detection [4,5,6]. Even if the initial reviewers are found quickly and complete their reviews on time (minimum 2-3 months), they might not be conclusive for the editor, so another reviewer will be solicited, adding at least two more months before a decision is made. “with referees”), so I’m worried If decision in process is longer than expected, I guess it is positive. This could mean a desk rejection, because the paper does not fit with the aim/scope of the journal, may not be For additional information, please check our peer review policies for Springer, BMC and Nature portfolio or visit the respective journal website. 15,2017, the status changed to 'Decision in Process' and it is stuck at this stage since then. This can go back and forth a few times, my record so far is five rounds. Right now, the editor is deciding whether to send your manuscript for review or not, which can take up to two months if the editor goes on vacation. The review got over and the status changed to decision pending. The pause in time does not always mean a rejection in underway. How long will it take this phase, i. We have had correspondences with the editorial board of the journal, but no responses received from them up to r/makemychoice: Are you indecisive? We know. It took five days for getting the "Editor assigned" status after my submission and still The reviews came back fairly quickly, and for the past 4-5 weeks the paper is showing that it is awaiting the final decision. It is almost certainly not worth going back to the Editor, as they will only ever consider reversing a decision if the It may just be that the status changes each time the paper gets passed to a reviewer (e. If you must submit to another Journal Journal if you think the editor is delaying too much write a reminder It has been 1 month since I submitted an article to one of the leading journals in my field. media outlets such as the entertainment news program Extra, Rolling Stone magazine, and The New York Post newspaper, even claimed there was a "fight quota" for each episode and that they and other guests were encouraged to fight one another. Does it mean that the manuscript will be sent again for another ‘Decision in Process’ on the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) means that the editor has logged a decision in the system but is awaiting confirmation from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Fortunately, the editor's decision was completed on 10/3/2023, but there has been no update since this last update. Overall, things sound positive, and you should receive the decision soon. At the moment, the review process if over, and your paper will receive the first decision. As another person said it’s probably difficulty in finding reviewers, but it would be nice to get occasional updates from the editor. If it goes longer that's a good sign because it's probably gone to a sub editor with more expertise in the field. Otherwise I will be in touch in the near future. A second major revision was decided. Is that a switch in assigned editors? A memo that the editor downloaded the paper? "With editor" means an editor has been assigned, but no reviewers have been invited yet. Good For reference, the manuscript was previously sent to a different Springer journal, which uses the old manuscript tracking system, which was a bit more detailed in this sense: Decision Made 8th May 24 Editor Review Started 6th May 24 Initial Manuscript Review Started 3rd May 24 Editor Assigned 1st May 24 Submission 19th Apr 24 I sent a submission to an Elsevier Journal. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance Ignore it until you receive the decision via email. More than that you may email him Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. In August, we received an email I submitted to a springer journal, the day after the status changed to “editor assigned”, and it stayed like that for 3 weeks. Sometimes, the editor needs to take the help of the editorial board to come to a decision if he or she is unsure about a Speaking as an area editor (for one Springer journal and for one Elsevier journal), just a note on that we use editorial systems which, mildly speaking, are a bit cumbersome. Once the editor has made the decision on your paper, the status will change to ‘decision made’. The EiC makes the final decision on the manuscript. They rejected. If you think the comments are wrong, go to another journal and try again. My MS apparently did not undergo p Reviewers have commented and completed their review on March 19. Arenas. . the editor of the first journal consulted with the editor of the second and in their response letter they said if we transferred it would go out immediately for review. " In the past, I have submitted many articles to several journals and there has always been the "under review" process. Springer with Editor. Then, the paper went through the peer-review process for 40 days. I'm in sciences, so a different set of publication norms, but for me, a polite note to the editor would be entirely reasonable. Next you will see “Editor Decision Started”. This review could either be the internal check by the editor or peer review. Please what means ''with editor''. Springer's tracking system showed "Reviewer reports received / Ready for editor’s decision" after a major revision on December 26th. /r/immigration is protesting Reddit's API changes. Nature is pretty slow at the moment. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in Dear Editor, Recently, the status of my revised manuscript in a Springer journal changed as follows: 09 Nov: Submitted to the Journal 11 Nov: under review 03 Dec: under review 05 Dec: Required reviews completed 11 Dec: Decision in process 12 Dec: With Editor. Here you can let other redditors make the hard or very easy choices for you. Most recent answer I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a week. Authors can suggest peer reviewers in the cover letter. Hi all, Humanities/post-doc early career/UK Let me make one thing clear first - I'm only asking this question because of the specific nature of the article in question - in general, yes, of course, I would re-submit a revised article after getting such a verdict!. Two days ago Anyway, enough rambling, TLDR - after reading some stuff here, I'm second-guessing my choice of a Springer Spaniel as our next dog. Decision in Process: This means that the editor is now taking a decision on your paper based on the peer reviewer comments and his/her own opinion. Then, (after two weeks) it takes "Editor invited". Since then the status did not change. In cases where it goes from “with editor” directly to “decision in process”, this may mean a desk rejection has been recommended, but it’s not a certainty that will happen, and depending on the journal’s workflow, it may not mean a desk rejection has been Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. The The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a different editor or sent the manuscript back to the editor. However, after I performed minor edits and resubmitted it, it went to under-review. From my point of view, one month is enough for the first decision, 2-3 months are OK for the review process, then one month for the final decision after revision. I have been in communication with the editor about this paper. How long this stage normally takes? is it too early to ask the My only thought is that the editor wanted to send to more reviewers initially, but they couldn't respond in a timely way, so the editor gave you a chance to revise after the initial reviews. I fulfilled the revisions and sent the manuscript on 10. On this forum I frequently read that the editor-in-chief would usually not overrule / outvote his associate editors. 1-Casual phone interview (30 min, why you want to be editor, they tell you about the interview process) 2-Task (first time I interviewed it was a 2h task reviewing two manuscripts, second time it was a written assessment with your opinions about a published paper) 3- 2-3h interview, first a written task (similar to the previous, review a manuscript in a 30 min then Good luck to you. Even after that happens, some journals leave the final decision to accept up to the editorial No it doesn’t make a difference, and it’s faster and more direct. Browse the sections below to learn what the calculated metrics can tell you about the performance of your journal article and journal. Cite 4 Hello! I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal 6 months ago. However, the responses were brief and felt dismissive, leaving me uncertain about the professionalism of the process. The editor-in-chief is the one to take the final decision. The Editor's decision on the choice of peer reviewers is final. I was told to expect a decision within two to three weeks Usually this process happens in Springer publications. I should comment I have, in my career, appealed 6 editor decisions, this is one of two occasions where it At this point, the editor takes a decision after reading to either invite reviewers for review or reject if he is not convinced the content will attract the potential readers/researchers. I have been editor and guest editor of many scientific journals. I think publishing a springer book is fine when you are defining a career trajectory and just want a publisher to enter your decision into the public record, but frankly I just don’t think the people who publish Springer books really try that hard at crafting the student’s mind; Just isn’t a top priority for the authors or the editors. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned At this point, the status said "With Editor". 7. 7 days Submission to One came back in ~2 weeks and another took nearly 5 months with very liberal editor emailing for the latter three. Upon receiving some positive feedback from our reviewers and AE and a decision of revise-resubmit, I turned the paper back in at the end of June. Now imagine that it's an editor of a major journal in finals/holiday season that is simultaneously trying to catch up on grading before the deadline and trying to get ready for their vacation. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. After I sent the revised manuscript, the status was ‘’with editor’’ and did not change for two weeks. The journal is an Elsevier publication that shows a time to acceptance of about 22 days after the first decision, by I have submitted my research article to Environment, Development and Sustainability (Springer) 3 weeks ago. 5 months. After a few days the status changed to under review and after 5 months the status changed to all essential reviews are complete and presently the status is final decision awaited. This problem has been particularly prevalent in health research news [3, 4]. “Decision in process” means one editor has made a recommendation, but another editor needs to approve it. Stage 2: Editor assigned. Days from acceptance to This section presents the results and findings of this paper by answering the research questions mentioned in the introduction section. The status "under editor evaluation" indicates that the paper is with the Associate Editor (AE) who will evaluate it based on the reviews and decide whether the paper should be accepted, rejected After resubmitting my revised manuscript on 20th of June, the status changed to 'under review' after only 4 days and then after 6 days (on 30th of June) it changed to 'required reviews completed. They want to publish your work but some some reason the paper didn't fit the aim & scope in the eyes of the editor. Now imagine that it's an editor of a major journal who has many articles to work through. The first is the subscription model. Instances of this decision are also rather rare. as soon as the media is aware) or legal questions please contact your Springer Publishing Editor who will liaise with Springer Nature's Communications department and/or the Legal Department. Manuscript status changed immediately from "With the Editor" to "Decision in Process" 3. I submitted a revised manuscript, but the status has not been changed from “under consideration” for 1 month. gxmzgpu lyhzv zxe ryspq nvnwb kfwone mpupsg gegsu ezuey acepy