Under review paper. Ask Question Asked 2 years ago.
Under review paper Recently, several works leveraged pixel-space diffusion models for My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. ’. Modified 1 year, 3 months ago. The clients then perform Ksteps of local training to obtain θi,K tbased on the global model θ, and send the updates θi,K t−θ back to the server. Vaswani (2017). But, after that, the status changed to "Under review" for three days, and then it changed to "Reviewers assigned" again. (2018a) interpret over-parametrization as a means of implicit acceleration during optimization. Share Add a Comment. We then compute the differences to identify the dimensions with the largest changes and consistent change directions. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 DIFFERENTIABLE INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown great potential in generating high-quality solutions for integer linear programs (ILPs). " A few days later, the status switched back to "Under Review" again. The hyperparameters of this pseudo-Bayesian network are tuned by a Bayesian optimizer based on Gaussian processes. 2024 as mentioned below “Unfortunately, from a scientific point of view, the contents of the manuscript are not sufficient to justify evaluation in a high-impact journal. It isn't clear from your story whether the speaker cited their own paper under review, or someone else's paper under review. Consultation paper on Review of SME segment framework under SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018, and applicability of corporate governance provisions under SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 on SME companies to strengthen pre-listing and post-listing SME provisions Click here to provide your comments . Put them with all the published ones but have it listed as ‘Under review at Journal of XYZ’. Commented Oct 18, 2012 at 21:57. The vanilla trained deep reinforcement learning policy is trained via Deep Double Q-Network proposed by Hasselt et al. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 component from noise-dominant stochastic gradients using random projection. One month back, I had sent a polite enquiry to a person in editorial office about my paper. As a rule of thumb, always send inquiries to the journal if there is no Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 3. Again here's another policy page from one of Elsevier's journals: Submission declaration and verification. Thus, the article is currently under review in journal Y. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 triggers at the character, word, and sentence levels to enable backdoor attacks while maintaining semantics. 6 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist e7d1. Author(s), Title of the paper, journal name, in communication . @walkmanyi: See Suresh's answer. “Awaiting SE Recommendation” means that it went to a Section Editor (SE) of the journal for checking the match with that section of the journal. Open comment sort Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Gaussian Processes (Witty et al. On the other one hand, one really good argument is that listing your "under review" papers helps indicate what your current research interests are. , 2020), deep latent variable models (Josse et al. This results in a more sample On my primary app and all previous secondaries, I simply listed this paper as "Manuscript Under Review". For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned . g. The AE will now go through the manuscript to check for things such as a match with the scope of the journal, the quality of the writing, and even the novelty of the study. " I sent two reminders to the editor in the last 4 months, and they said they received one reviewer's response and are waiting for the second reviewer's report. Specifically, we use the DINO-v2 The paper is still in Under Review status. " Assuming this is external peer review, it's still quite a long time. It is slightly concerning that an editor would be invited after 8 months of submission. I recently submitted a paper to a Management journal, usually if the manuscript is in the review process, it shows "under review". The status changed to ‘Reviewer assigned’ approximately three times every three months. phd; graduate-admissions; Share. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2021 CAUSAL SCREENING TO INTERPRET GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT With the growing success of graph neural networks (GNNs), the explainability of GNN is attracting considerable attention. Last edited: Sep 6, 2019. However, I am concerned that the referee might reject my under-review paper, citing the arXiv version as a better the paper (title, abstract, introduction, etc. ' Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. , 2019) are two distinct subsets of multi-relational graphs (Hamilton). In contrast, our approach only necessitates access to the environment of the target task. How long will the tag "under review" stay? As I am a Master's student I dont know much about publication. Once an associate editor has been assigned, either the paper will go out for peer review or a desk-editorial decision will be made. It rises the so-called label bias issueCao et al. Fencer Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022 GENERALIZABLE PERSON RE-IDENTIFICATION WITH-OUT DEMOGRAPHICS Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Generalizable Person Re-Identification (DG ReID) aims to learn ready-to-use cross-domain representations for direct cross-data evaluation. What should I do? Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 REINFORCE estimator often suffers from high variance because of the sampling operation. (2017) estimate predictive uncertainty using a proper scoring rule as the training criteria to fed a DNN. Finally, the status changed to ‘Required reviews completed. Heterogeneous graphs feature diverse types of nodes and edges, with edges typically constrained based on node types, often connecting nodes of specific Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2018 solution has several issues. If you write on your CV that the paper is under review, nobody else has any way of verifying the quality, and it starts to feel like people are just doing it to pad their CV. These things are pretty normal in peer-review system. While this scaling trend affirms the need to train a giant model across Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022 we implement PDM by merging a normalizing flow model and a diffusion model, which constructs a tractable, learnable, and flexible nonlinear diffusing mechanism. The publishing house is satisfied with all the documents, details, and content submitted, with the latter also deemed in line with the journal’s theme and content. Commented Oct 18, 2012 at 21:58. In that way, I can focus each (non-absorbed-by-other-task-than-research-)day on what I feel like: writing, reading to back up the idea, do the needed computations, etc. ” conditioned on a set of demonstrations (Left). Moreover, Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 Figure 1: Illustrations for ICL and IT using sentiment analysis as an example. Tips To Write An Review Article Fast. Today, another of my articles was accepted. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 In this paper, we provide similar approaches for pre-training a critic or value network, which can be combined with most existing off-policy reinforcement learning algorithms, leading to improved training efficiency and stability. Sci. I posted my first draft paper on SSRN - it is "under review by ssrn" for a couple of days. (2021);Zhao et al. Typically, a review writer works in the related field and already has a good knowledge of the topic, but not neces-sarily. Please could you tell me why First I was informed that it was "Initial version" and now the status says "under review". Don't worry about all these. The time it takes to fully review a paper ranges depending on the journal but typically the process takes several months. – JeffE. What worries me is not really the difference, as it is the fact that once I submitted the paper it went automatically "in review". I am in fundamental mathematics and personally like to have, at any given time, at least one paper under review, one paper that mostly needs writing, one idea to develop that could make a paper. Since arXiv is not a journal, there is no issue. Does it usually take some much time ? what kind of "review" is that ? Generally 3-5 days at most. The status is still "Under review. Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the handling Editor the status may later The meaning of ‘manuscript under review’ When a manuscript is ‘under review’, it has been sent to external peer reviewers and the journal editor awaits these peer reviewers’ assessments. If the paper never makes it out or shifts to another journal, so be it. After the editoral review, the reviewers were invited, and then the status changed to "Reviewers assigned" for two months. The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. This time, once upon submission the status If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. I’ve seen people list them with all the others and have ‘In Draft’ after them. They are generally classified as descriptive, declarative, or interrogative and can also be grouped into Hence, after the search for the literature, the essential themes and key concepts of the review paper must be identified and synthesised together. On the other hand, in case that your paper is accepted I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. It's a bi-monthly journal. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2021 Ghahramani (2016) use MC dropout to estimate predictive uncertainty for approximating a Bayesian convolutional neural network. " What does this mean? I have submitted my paper to a Q2 journal of Elsevier and the status changes are as follows:Submitted: 16 May 2018; Under Review: 19 May 2018; Under Editorial Evaluation: 03 June 2018; and very next day (after 12 hours) changed again to "Under Review": 04 June 2018. (2013) with the OpenAI version Brockman et al. This approach en-hances performance compared to employing GaLore throughout all stages. Allure Allure. (2024a), there exists a small yet emerging body of work at the intersection of LLMs and graph reasoning. Before You Begin to Search or Write . Within 1. Should I mention these two on my resume or CV if yes how?As I have usually have people with publish papers mentioning it one resueme or cv. After making corrections I have submitted the revised manuscript around 1. One possible issue if some of the latest reviewers are new, rather than the ones who have been looking at it, is that a new review might have different ideas than the others. 52 Such a paper was introduced at the thirteenth session of the Commission,53 at which it was agreed that the lessons learned paper should be kept under review by the Commission to reflect its discussions and to incorporate If you're seeing 'under review', it's because the paper has been sent to reviewers. As such, the research paper seeks to answer various research questions by conducting experiments to investigate a given phenomenon. Clearly define the topic. Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. 5 months of submission of the original manuscript, I got the reviewers' comments. University of Sfax. 06. 31 3 3 bronze badges. •We propose membrane potential smoothing and temporally adjacent Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review. If a paper moves from an internal review directly to "Evaluating recommendation," it is probably a case of desk rejection. , Institute for AI, Tsinghua-Bosch Joint ML Center, The paper is still in Under Review status. Publication Support Since the status is EA: Name of Editor "Under Review”, it seems like the paper is still being screened by the journal and has not yet been sent to peer reviewers. If however, the paper has been showing the status "Under review" from the time of submission, without any other status change, then it could mean that your paper is still under the initial I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal a few months ago. So, what should I do Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 ments or transition functions to train in, which may not be feasible if task environments differ. of Comp. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 server sends the current global model θ t to a randomly-selected subset of mclients. But today suddenly the status changed back to I submitted a manuscript on April 20, and the status remains unchanged at “Under editorial assessment” till date. Recently,I have submitted my paper to one of the Wiley Journals, the status first change to "article received" then "under review" then after 3days of submission to "in review". Choose a review topic that has sufficient The status “Under Review” indicates that the peer review process is ongoing, and could take up to 2-3 months to complete. However, although the paper went under review on 6th September, the status date of the paper have changed several times. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 produces high quality views with significantly lower complexity compared to NeRF, it is still chal-lenging for resource-constrained platforms like mobile phones. Perozzi et al. Please could you tell me why Review paper format usually includes the citation list – it is your nod to the scholarly community, acknowledging the contributions of others. The I submitted my research paper to the Journal of Web Engineering 5 months ago. Share. As such, a wide variety of point-based approaches have been Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 LATENT DIFFUSION COUNTERFACTUAL EXPLANATIONS Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Counterfactual explanations have emerged as a promising method for elucidat-ing the behavior of opaque black-box models. Heterogeneity Multiplex graphs and heterogeneous graphs (Lv et al. Please people tell me that how to remove the paper from SSRN. 2023 The paper is still in Under Review status. If the manuscript clears Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. This synthesis primarily I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. (2023) and Wang et al. Going by this logic, "All reviews complete" seem to indicate that all the reviewers have accepted the review invitation. The decision is an important factor for my graduation. " Around 3 weeks later, they updated The team declined to comment while their paper is under review at Science. Manuscripts that are clearly of inferior quality should be rejected without peer Hello, I have experienced a manuscript tracking that is a little odd. However, a critical drawback of these models is their computation-ally intensive inference Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2023 All of the experiments are conducted in the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) Bellemare et al. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Multiplexity vs. It aims to leverage the variations in the multi-task demonstration dataset to learn a generalizable reward func-tion. Since the latent confounder Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 TOWARDS GLOBAL INTERACTION EFFICIENCY OF GRAPH NETWORKS Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT A graph inherently embodies comprehensive interactions among all its nodes when viewed globally. 1. The paper actually summarizes the information gathered by the researcher on the topic. I am a little bit worried what could be the reason for this. What does this brief "Under review" means? Why dit The paper is still in Under Review status. Either: The editor has already received the necessary reviews, and is taking a decision (perhaps taking another look at your paper) The editor has not Submission status changed from "Under Review" to "Reviewers Assigned" in Editorial Manager Springer . So keep that in mind and it may be better for your sanity to not The paper is still in Under Review status. These two stages are designed to handle the heterogeneous elements within the trajectory, thereby reducing the overall training difficulty. (2023). Each citation is a thread in the larger tapestry of academic discourse, enabling readers to delve deeper into the research that has shaped your review. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2017 point estimate for the remaining parameters. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses; Queries to the Editor Manuscript Withdrawal Responding to Peer Reviewers Basics of Peer Review Responding to Peer Reviewers Journal Rejection Reasons Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Outside of Fatemi et al. During this process, the reviewers will carefully assess the paper’s content, methodology, Papers under review cannot be cited into your submitted manuscript because you are not sure that your paper will be accepted for publication. Two days ago I got a mail regarding acceptance of my research paper and My one paper is still under review . As I continue through more secondaries, would it be appropriate to instead list ("Manuscript Under Revision, [Journal Name]") Members don't see this ad. However, this is a minor thing, and not something that you need to worry about (hopefully). As the duration between this and the next update is about two weeks, this seems When a paper is marked as “under review,” it means that the manuscript has been submitted for peer-review by experts in the relevant field. He replied that he was sorry and he has contacted senior editor to speed up the process. Once a decision has been In this case, the (associate) editor has a hard time making a decision. This is not very uncommon, since the initial screening may take a few weeks. You are doing the best you can, at the time. One possibility is that the "under review" status referred to the initial admin check post which a manuscript is assigned to an editor. See more For most journals, the status "under review" is used to indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external review. various procedural, information technology and logistical matters, including data storage and handling, communications with the coastal State and so forth. If this guess is wrong, then the next most likely thing is probably a more serious breakdown in the review Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 •We consider the SNN as an ensemble of multiple temporal subnetworks and point out that excessive differences in membrane potential distributions across timesteps, and hence output instability, is the key factor affecting performance. Sort by: Best. The status was "with Editor" until 2 weeks and then it went to "under review. From this construction, we prove that variational gap can be further tightened by training the forward diffusion, nonlinearly. It typically fully exploit However, in this case, “Under Review” means that the paper was picked up for an initial review of the quality of the paper and of a match with the journal’s scope. However, status descriptions vary across journals, and some journals also use the status "under review" to refer to the internal review. (Note that for some journals, this could mean the AE review, but again, here, it does seem that the manuscript is being checked by the peer reviewers. Improve this question. Hello all, #1, reviewer #1 gives it back to editor, editor gives it to reviewer #2, and so on). Please could you tell me why Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses [Handbook] For now though, all the best for the next steps for your manuscript! And do let us know how this one turns out too Answered by Editage Insights on 27 May, 2020 . , 2020), Imitation Learning (Zhang et al. Follow answered Aug 25, 2021 at 1:22. (2016). Nawel Jmail. 2 DIFFUSION MODEL A representative instance of diffusion models is the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) (Ho et al. Accompanied by the ever increasing performance, reaching super-human Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2023 the open-set setting based on pre-trained VL models. Architecture. Now the server can aggregate the updates with some specific rules to under review [Paper] Finite element analysis, machine learning, and digital twins for soft robots: state-of-arts and perspectives. Understanding the significance of manuscript statuses is crucial. All the existing answers assume that it was the speaker's paper. I recently submitted an article to an Elsevier journal X. For a specific set of comparison images, we average-pool the features of the labeled target regions (the orange parts in the image) into one dimension. (2023) by utilizing and finetuning soft-token prompts to better encode graphs for EDIT: In Citing a paper under review in 2 different conferences there is a somewhat similar situation. Titles are of different types and must be chosen according to the topic under review. We’ve added links to these resources below: Keep Calm And Wait: A Guide To A status change from AE Assigned to AE Review means that the manuscript has been picked up by the AE for review. Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. As I am actively seeking job opportunities, I am considering posting the new paper on arXiv. The paper is still in Under Review status. Since the date of the status has been unchanged also for 2 months, I sent an inquiry to ask about the status of the manuscript a week ago. I wanted to know how long it takes for the final decision made by the editor and reviewers. Hence, going beyond existing studies in long-range in-teractions, which focus Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2020 PRIVACY-PRESERVING REPRESENTATION LEARNING BY DISENTANGLEMENT Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Deep learning and latest machine learning technology heralded an era of suc-cess in data analysis. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 2. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. Even when the editor was not assigned, the term 'under review' was used. This stage is often the longest one in the manuscript publication process. Notably, small businesses and individual users tend to utilize cloud resources to support NAS goo (2023). It seems that the Associate Editor (AE) felt it could fit How long will the status of my paper show "Under Review?" Should I send a reminder if my paper has been under review for nearly four months? We also recommend useful handbooks on manuscript submission statuses and jouranl communicaion by R Upskill, our sister brand. However, there is a possibility that the paper was sent for an external peer review (particularly since "Under review" appears twice) and that the reviewers were very prompt. All the best for the next stages! Answered by Irfan Syed on A review paper and the research paper differ in that the review paper is based on other published works whereas a research paper is based on original research and the analysis of raw data. I was talking from my previous experience with this journal that when I submit a paper it goes in the review process as "under review". 2) the second paper in question is with a second coauthor. The status was "Under Review" for about 2 months and recently changed to "Ready for Decision. Due to this constraint, these LMs are unable to utilize the full input of long documents. 138k 52 52 gold badges 341 341 silver badges 532 532 Under review as a paper at IJCV A Comprehensive Study on Robustness of Image Classi cation Models: Benchmarking and Rethinking Chang Liu 2 y, Yinpeng Dong 1,5 y, Wenzhao Xiang 3,7, Xiao Yang 1, Hang Su 1,6*, Jun Zhu 1,5, Yuefeng Chen 4, Yuan He 4, Hui Xue 4 and Shibao Zheng 2 1* Dept. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. This motivates the use of baselines, which reduce variance without changing the optimal solution. Arora et al. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 and cost-efficient NAS Demirovic et al. That team has now completed its work, hence the reversion to "submitted" status. (2016) (the initial idea is proposed in van Hasselt (2010)). . But till date, the status of the manuscript is showing "Under review . The purpose of a review paper is to review information on a particular topic. under review Writing a literature review in the pre or post-qualification, will be required to undertake a literature review, either as part of a course of study, as a key step in the research process. 1 ALIGNER: ONLINE ENCODING OF PERSONALIZED CONCEPTS As previously mentioned, we use a pre-trained vision encoder to build the Aligner, which embeds personalized concepts online, with its output serving as an identifier for recognizing queried images. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 training difficulty. Is that right? I got major revisions. Under Review, May 19: Based on the EiC’s decision/recommendation, the AE seems to have sent the paper for a review. However, existing meth-ods typically rely on a supervised I submitted my revised manuscript to the journal after incorporating the reviewer's comments. When a paper has been accepted for publication but not yet published, however, you should use the term “in press” in place of a year in citations: Few fully understand the publication process (Clarke, in press). ' If not, and it directly went to ‘Under Review’ after submission, this indicates the internal check (for aspects such as scope match, novelty factor, quality of the writing, and adherence to guidelines). Similarly, continuous efforts have been made to improve the attack stealthiness by differ- Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 abrupt, previous observations can be used to design a source distribution approximately similar to the true distribution of the next sample in the sequence; we propose several such designs in our work. First, if a graph used for training has large diameter, the unrolled GNN computational graph will be large (cf. This is sometimes done by junior scholars, but looks odd for senior scholars, at least in many fields. Some editors will resolve it, but some will make you go round and round. I cannot determine the strengths and innovative aspects of the research work "Under review" may include the review of the editor or editors, so in this case it may be under review. I submitted a manuscript in an Elsevier journal around 3. However, considering that the status of your paper changed to "Under Review" within a day, it’s possible that "Under Review" in this case still refers to the initial editorial screening. Bidirectional LSTMs on long sequences). " I wrote an email to the editor but didn't get a reply. Add a comment | 1 Answer Sorted by: Reset to default 2 . I think this journal uses the term 'under review' to refer to both internal and external review. Your kind comments are required for this The status changes you mention are slightly unusual. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. Under review paper appearing on SSRN. Now, in this stage, external experts on the subject that you’ve written about are verifying your paper You haven't mentioned the statuses before your paper moved to "Under review. So I don't really end up minding it too much. If the university says it is fine, then it is fine. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to review your manuscript. Nov 19, 2024 | Reports : Reports for Public Comments The paper is still in Under Review status. Lakshminarayanan et al. It's out of the question to consider merging both papers into one, for 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. The status "Editor invited" means that an Associate Editor(AE) has been invited for your paper. After that, it changed to "under review" but now, after 20 days, again it changed to "reviewers assigned. Please could you tell me why Does "Under Review" mean the paper has been assigned to an external reviewer? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? A guide to understanding journal statuses [Handbook] All the best for the next stages! Answered by Editage Insights on 11 Sep, 2023 . Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 ALIGNING HUMAN MOTION GENERATION WITH HUMAN PERCEPTIONS Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Human motion generation is a critical task with a wide range of applications. Can someone please say what does the above means and what are the steps that follow in order for a paper to be accepted in a journal. ’ I would like to know whether ‘Under review’ means an internal or an external Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2019 with quadratic activations, all second-order stationary points are global minimizers. In the first stage, the model focuses solely on learning to predict forward dy-namics, which then serves as the pre-trained model for the subsequent policy generation. It also may be (as Maarten commented) that the paper was sent out and the reviewers indicated that the paper was not suitable for that journal without comments. Then, the status changes to "under review" again. ) can be found in Mayer (2009). Mei et al. The only time that having non-numeric information in the year field may cause trouble is if you (a) have several "in-press" pieces by the same author(s) and (b) need to ensure that the entries are sorted in a certain order. This leads to fun-damental issues with learning (e. , vanishing/exploding gradients) and implementation difficulties The status of my manuscript is currently "under review" after a minor revision and I had resubmitted the revision. Please could you tell me why Articles under Review: If your article is under review, it means that it’s passed the “in review” stage of editorial checks. Through ICL, the LLM infers a ”Negative” sentiment for ”Many pointless. When adding an unpublished paper to an APA reference list, the correct format I submitted a paper 10 months ago to Springer on behalf of Pramana – Journal of Physics. Xgk Xgk. (2022) and use a baseline bthat is generated by a small neural network with a single hidden layer that takes as Usually it doesn't, because this journal policy is typically of the form "if you submit here, your paper is not currently under review by another journal". Hope that helps. Rejection is always possible, but they have a lot invested in the paper and you have been cooperating. My guess is that the first "Under review" appeared when the first reviewer accepted the review invitation. Much slower than even 5 years ago 6 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No My under review paper has the same topic as one of the research topics in a lab in that university. Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2021 REVISITING POINT CLOUD CLASSIFICATION WITH A SIMPLE AND EFFECTIVE BASELINE Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Processing point cloud data is an important component of many real-world sys-tems. I have heard that reviewers are given 14 days to send their reports to the journal. I'm second author and submission is at a high impact journal. Liuchao Jin, Xiaoya Zhai, Wenbo Xue, Jingchao Jiang, Kang Zhang, Wei-Hsin Liao*. Achieving high realism in generated motions requires naturalness, smoothness, and plausibility. How can I add this new article citation to the first manuscript during the period under review? If the first manuscript was accepted can I add this citation at the page proof stage? Thank you for your time and attention. Please could you tell me why One can enter non-numeric information -- such as "in press" and "forthcoming" -- directly in the year field of a bibliographic entry. Yes, "Under Review" typically indicates that the submitted paper has successfully passed the initial editorial check and has entered the peer review process. , 2021). 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests The paper is still in Under Review status. The article was consider out-of-scope, so I re-submitted it to another Elsevier journal Y (via article transfer). , 2020) and more (Li & Zhu, 2022; Yao et al. (2018), Chizat & Bach (2018), and Sirignano & Spiliopoulos (2018) take a distributional view of over-parametrized networks. Follow asked Nov 9, 2020 at 15:09. 5 months ago. Now, it has changed to ‘Under review. Related resources: The paper is still in Under Review status. I have come across some Springer journals that use An Associate Editor (AE) has not yet been assigned to your article. (2023); Bohdal et al. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. Cite. I am a postdoc in mathematics, currently finishing a paper that extends a previous one which has been under review for three months. While our analysis primarily focuses on GaLore, it also has significant connections to other memory-efficient algorithms. Under Review. Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. A previously published ASME conference paper is an acceptable submission. Improve this answer. This approach can only give one xed learning rates to be used in all iterations, which is not optimal, whereas the RL agent in our Under Review: This means that the manuscript is presently under peer review. In fact, I have submitted it on the 21st November 2019. You should definitely send a polite email to the journal inquiring about the current status of the paper and by when the reviews are expected to come in. However, the most powerful LMs have one significant drawback: a fixed-sized input. What does this indicate? Is my paper at risk of rejection? The papers under review should definitely go on the CV. It may reflect that your paper is published in other journal or will face plagiarism like issues. Ethical standards suggest that prior to making a unilateral decision to reject a paper on the basis of technical merit, the Editor-in-Chief consider seeking advice from an Associate Editor (AE) with expertise in a relevant area. The status shows that the Editorial Assistant (EA) has yet to complete the initial checks on the paper. This is usually journal-dependent, e. — Zack Savitsky, Quanta Magazine , 10 Apr. ) Peer review can take a few weeks or even months based on the topic and domain as well as on availability of the For most journals, a status change from "With Editor" to "Under review" would indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external peer review. Today, exactly one month has passed since his reply and the status still remains under review. However, a few Submitted paper (under review) can referred as. An important complexity factor results from the fact that splatting volumetric elements with trans-parency requires sorting before α-blending, and it is difficult to combine I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. , 2021; Zhang et al. Fortunately, an easy fix for this is Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? To write to journals, you may also find this handbook helpful: A practical handbook of templates for communicating with the journal. Also, we As for "under review" articles, I would only list them in the CV at all: If I were a graduate student or postdoc; If I needed to demonstrate that the articles were under review (internal performance reviews, etc. (2024) directly follows up on Fatemi et al. Peer review times vary per journal. How to Reference an Unpublished Work in APA Referencing. It can last from a few weeks to several months. In the forward process, noise is progressively added to clean data x 0 until it is corrupted into Gaussian noise The paper is still in Under Review status. I think mine is different in two aspects: 1) the fields, and hence the common practices, are generally different. One downside, in addition to those mentioned by other posters, is that if your paper is not accepted than readers of your CV will know which journals rejected you. At this stage, the manuscript is being evaluated by experts in Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. (2021), which is defined as that the prompt tuned on limited training classes forcefully selects a known class as the predictions for unknown classes, in open-set scenarios. 4 Recommendations. Empirically, we use ASPeeD in two nontrivial sequential tasks: video prediction and robot control1. To manage costs, these NAS users often need to allocate a predefined time budget for using cloud However, I would suggest that you send an inquiry to the journal as this will serve as a gentle reminder to the editor and can speed up the review process. Crazy or not, double-blind submissions require such a policy. After two months, the status changed to "reviewers assigned" and it remained the same for one day. In contrast, IT involves further tuning the LLM’s parameters with the IT training data, and You can list them separately in an "under review" section. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. In our work, we followClark et al. While great success has been made, these methods have some intrinsic limitations for modeling hidden confounder. Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Pretrained Language Models (LMs) have shown excellent results in achieving human-like performance on many language tasks. However, current works on feature attribution, which frame explanation For the past seven months, it is "Under Review". Bayesian AL. Previously, it was under review by an internal administrative team. – It is to be understood that "under review" does not mean it will EVER get published (but likely will). Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 TEXTBOOK CONSISTENCY WEIGHTED INTERNET IM-PROVES EFFICIENCY TWOFOLD Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT We propose a novel method, Textbook Consistency, to improve the training effi-ciency of large language models by leveraging textbooks as a guiding signal for learning Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 IMPROVING INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION BY SIMULATING AUDIENCES WITH LANGUAGE MODELS Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT How do we communicate with others to achieve our goals? We use our prior expe-rience or advice from others, or construct a Hey Everyone I am btech CSE-AI student in my final year . ) (and honestly who doesn't?) then you can include them but the distinction that the paper has been through some stages of review, together with the name If the paper was under review for a long time (depending on how long it typically takes to review a paper in your field) and then went to under editor evaluation for a few weeks before reverting back to under review, that would be indirect evidence for this guess. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned The dashboard status is showing that the paper is under review but the editor has given the decision on dated 25. and Tech. (2023); Li et al. The papers that you’re still writing is a grey area. Don t cite it. If you're seeing 'under review', it's because the paper has been sent to reviewers. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. Now the paper status in "Under review". We first consider return-maximising reinforcement learning, and Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 EFFICIENT DENOISING DIFFUSION VIA PROBABILIS-TIC MASKING Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Diffusion models have exhibited remarkable advancements in generating high-quality data. , 2020b), which contains a forward and a reverse process to generate samples. This post explains the difference between the journal paper status of In Review and Under Review. Steps for Writing a Review Paper. However, when the triggers are words that are rarely seen, they are easily detected by defenders. Then I got the following reply; “At present, the manuscript is still under editorial assessment. External peer review would not be completed in a few days’ time. some journals can move the status when one review has been submitted, while others might ask for 2 or 3 or more. A possible way to resolve this conflict is to get another review, and therefore (s)he could send the article to a third reviewer. 7-10 days has been my normal experience the last few months. In this Although the paper underwent an "internal-review" from the co-authors (3 authors in total), and it went through the "first assessment" from the editors of the journal (both an Associate Editor and the Editor-In-Chief), who eventually decided to send the paper out for a peer-review, I am still thinking that a "good" moment for sending the paper out, in a preprint Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Figure 1: Illustration of our method. I think the first status update 'AE not assigned, under review' was used to refer to the initial admin check that is done by editorial assistants before the paper is sent for I submitted a manuscript in an Elsevier journal in April 2018. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 CONTINUOUS INDETERMINATE PROBABILITY NEU-RAL NETWORK Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT Currently, there is no mathematical analytical form for a general posterior, how-ever, Indeterminate Probability Theory Anonymous (2024) has now discovered a way to address Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2024 PIPELINE PARALLELISM OPTIMIZATION WITHDEEP REINFORCEMENTLEARNING Anonymous authors Paper under double-blind review ABSTRACT It has been widely observed that larger neural networks perform better in many real-world applications. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; 2; Comment. We demonstrate that a In some cases, by Under Review, the journal may mean either the second peer review or the second AE/ME review. Viewed 6k times 2 . Ask Question Asked 2 years ago. ' Home; English Editing Services. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. Please could you tell me why Thanks, no I didnt see the status change in the same submission. nhjnf eyrlqeb tituru zgzeb pqtkm xjmm pyyx ulrhxut ghzxaoal ptlo